Friday, August 22, 2008

The Government's New 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

Having just released new findings by the National Institute of Standards and Technology that claim a brand new government conspiracy theory just in time to try to distract attention away from protests set up for September 11th, and more importantly, to attempt to demean the symbolic reappearance by Representative Dennis Kucinich on September 10th before the House, where he intends to submit one million signatures demanding the beginning of impeachment proceedings against George Bush and Dick Cheney, our government once again shows a cunning propensity for deception that should take any right thinking person's breath away.

Instead, across cyber space, people are at each other's throats once more, just the way our new brand of government likes it. If there has ever been a wedge issue that will bring out a more heated and name calling filled verbal slug fest, it's 9/11.

There are those who believe that the government would NEVER be capable of pulling off something so horrific. Their minds can not conceive of any such silliness. But yet, due to other lies of George Bush and his criminal cadre, more people have died in Iraq and Afghanistan than 9/11's shock and awe of the American people ever did. So if one can reconcile all of the criminal acts committed by this administration, why can their minds not get around this? The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a lie and they kept that secret for almost 40 years. The Israeli attack on the Liberty was kept to a mere murmur, and still is to this day.

The arguments that there would have to be too many people involved fall slightly apart when one realizes that in any such operation, it would be so compartmentalized that there may be people walking around today who have no idea they were a part of it. But there are way too many 'coincidences' for these theories to be dismissed out of hand just because the government says it is so.

There are also the flip side of the coin types. Those who believe it was all the U.S. government, period. Those arguments can't stand the test either due to too many reports of actors other than Americans being involved. Pakistani ISI heads, Saudi money flowing to Atta through Pakistan, Bandar 'Bush' having a cigar with the President on the White House balcony, and oh, the fact that 15 of the hijackers were Saudis. Hmm, come to think of it, why didn't we bomb Saudi Arabia again? Oh that's right. Because the Bush family has deep ties to the Saudi Royals and the bin Laden family in particular.

So then we have to look at the third possible 'conspiracy theory'. Because when you boil it all down to the bone, that's all any of the explanations truly are, from the government's to the lizard people, conspiracy theories. The third theory says that elements within the government knew about the attacks ahead of time, did nothing to try to stop them, and may have actually aided the hijackers in order to bring about a new Pearl Harbor. This new Pearl Harbor, talked about in the Project For A new American Century's playbook, would be the catalyst for sweeping changes to our way of life here at home, and an excuse for the implementation of a 'New World Order'.

Without going into every rehashed detail of why the government's new theory of the building seven collapse is ridiculous on it's face due to the never heard of before 'thermal expansion' phenomenon, all one has to do is go back and read FEMA's own report to strike this newest NIST lie back into the gutter where it belongs. FEMA's World Trade Center Building Performance Study says this: "Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface micro structure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel… The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified."

But yet, in the NIST report, not one word of corrosive metal is mentioned. The other simple explanation by NIST of no explosion being heard before the building seven collapse being proof that nothing other than the fires brought the building down are laughable because, if all of the other experts who say it was a controlled demolition are right and thermite was used to cut through the steel beams, there would have been no 'explosion'. Back to the drawing board NIST. Your newest fable is as bad as the debunked 9/11 Omission Report. Coincidence after coincidence after lie and omissions of fact. They never have explained how CNN and BBC reported that building seven collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

So it comes down to who to believe. Do you believe people who have spent the past seven years tearing gaping holes in the official conspiracy theory? Or do you say "Baaah" and wander blindly behind the government's official story? A story that says that on one day in September seven years ago, a phenomenon occurred that had never before happened, nor has it happened since?

No one wants to believe that the government that has sworn to serve and protect could ever be capable of being involved in this. It means that everything we believe is a lie. But there is too much evidence that contradicts the official story, too many people whose voices we don't get to hear, save on Bill O'Reilly's Fun Time Hour where he shouts down what he doesn't want you to hear. Why doesn't the MSM do a real investigation instead of parroting whatever the government tells them? Wouldn't we all rather know the absolute truth, rather than have this linger on and on like the JFK assassination?

Believe what you like. That's your right as an American. But for your own sake, take a look at both sides of the equation before dismissing people's ideas out of hand. Try discussing the issues that need resolving before allowing the neo-fascists to throw red herring arguments into the mix and begin the name calling process designed to stop all real discussion. Because if we have learned anything at all over these last tortuous 8 years, it's that we can not believe what the government tells us, and must research everything they say for ourselves. That's not the type of government I want, and to those sheep who blindly follow the leader without question or without inquiry, I would say, "It's your funeral......................." Believe nothing. Ask questions. Demand real answers..........................(Thermal expansion my ass. Explain the molten metal)

No comments: